Long-Term Care

Tax Treatment of Employer-Sponsored LTC for Partnerships vs Corporations

Jenna Petrizzo, Managing Partner at HollowtreeBy Jenna Petrizzo
Tax Treatment of Employer-Sponsored LTC for Partnerships vs Corporations article

Tax Treatment of Employer-Sponsored LTC for Partnerships vs Corporations

Your firm's entity structure determines whether long-term care insurance premiums generate immediate tax benefits or create additional taxable income for owners. Law firms, CPA practices, and other professional services typically operate as partnerships or LLPs, creating tax treatment that differs materially from traditional C-Corporation structures.

Understanding these differences is essential for CFOs, managing partners, and tax professionals evaluating LTC coverage as an employee benefit. The same premium dollar produces different tax outcomes depending on your entity type.

How Entity Structure Affects LTC Tax Treatment

Under IRC 7702B, tax-qualified LTC policies receive favorable treatment, but the mechanics vary significantly by entity structure.

C-Corporation LTC Tax Benefits

C-Corporations receive the most straightforward tax treatment for employer-sponsored LTC coverage. The corporation can deduct premium payments as ordinary business expenses with no dollar limitations. Employees receive no taxable income inclusion for these premiums.

This creates clean separation between business deduction and employee benefit. The corporation reduces taxable income while employees receive valuable coverage without current tax liability.

Partnership and LLP LTC Tax Treatment

Partnerships, including law firm LLPs and CPA firm partnerships, face more complex tax treatment. When the partnership pays LTC premiums for partners, those premiums are deductible by the partnership but flow through to each partner's K-1 as additional income.

Partners then claim personal deductions for these premiums on their individual tax returns, subject to age-based limitations under IRC 213(d). This creates a timing issue where partners recognize income in the current year but may face deduction limitations.

S-Corporation Considerations

S-Corporations follow partnership treatment for shareholders owning more than 2% of the company. Premiums paid for these shareholders are deductible by the S-Corp but included in the shareholder's W-2 income, then deductible on their personal return subject to age-based limits.

Shareholders owning 2% or less receive treatment similar to C-Corp employees, with no income inclusion.

Age-Based Deduction Limits Impact

The age-based deduction limits under IRC 213(d) significantly affect net tax benefits for partnership and S-Corp structures. For 2026, these limits are:

  • Age 40 and under: $480
  • Age 41-50: $900
  • Age 51-60: $1,800
  • Age 61-70: $4,800
  • Age 70+: $5,960

Partners or S-Corp shareholders with premium costs exceeding their age-based limit cannot deduct the excess amount, creating potential tax inefficiency for younger partners or those with comprehensive coverage.

Professional Services Entity Planning

Law firms and CPA practices often choose partnership structures for operational flexibility, but this creates LTC tax complexity. Managing partners must weigh the administrative burden of K-1 reporting against the benefit value for partners.

Some firms address this by structuring LTC benefits as part of overall compensation planning, ensuring total partner compensation accounts for the tax impact of flow-through premiums.

Cost Analysis for Different Structures

Consider a $2,400 annual LTC premium for each covered individual:

C-Corporation: $2,400 business deduction, $0 employee income inclusion

Partnership (Partner age 45): $2,400 K-1 income to partner, $900 personal deduction, net $1,500 taxable income

Partnership (Partner age 65): $2,400 K-1 income to partner, $2,400 personal deduction, net $0 taxable income

These differences compound across multiple partners and affect the real cost of providing LTC coverage.

Implementation Considerations

Professional services firms evaluating LTC coverage should model tax impact across their partner age demographics. Younger partner-heavy firms may find traditional group health benefits more tax-efficient, while firms with older partners benefit more clearly from LTC coverage.

Hollowtree works with law firms, CPA practices, and other professional services to structure LTC plans that maximize tax efficiency within each entity's specific structure. We design coverage levels and contribution strategies that account for age-based limitations and flow-through income treatment.

The tax treatment complexity for partnerships and S-Corps requires careful planning to ensure LTC benefits achieve their intended value. Understanding these entity-specific rules allows firms to make informed decisions about coverage levels, contribution strategies, and overall benefit design.

Next step

Get the employer briefing

A concise breakdown built for leadership teams making benefits decisions.

Employer Briefing